Discovering that your homeowner association (HOA) or condominium board is levying a special assessment can be a stressful financial surprise. This feeling is compounded when you believe the assessment is unnecessary, excessive, or the product of poor management. While frustration is a natural reaction, a strategic and informed approach is far more effective than outright opposition. Your course of action should be methodical, collaborative, and grounded in the governing documents that bind the community.The first and most critical step is to thoroughly educate yourself. Do not rely on hearsay or assumptions. Request, in writing, a detailed breakdown from the board or management company outlining the specific purpose of the assessment. This should include cost estimates, contractor bids, the project timeline, and the total amount to be collected. Simultaneously, obtain a copy of the community’s governing documents—the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and bylaws. These documents explicitly outline the board’s authority to levy special assessments, the required process (including any notice periods or voting requirements), and the procedures for member challenges. Understanding these rules is your foundation; the assessment may be procedurally invalid if the board failed to follow its own bylaws.Armed with this information, engage in constructive dialogue before moving to confrontation. Attend the next board meeting, which you have a right to do as a member. Prepare clear, factual, and respectful questions. Inquire about the urgency of the project, ask if alternatives like phased repairs or reserve fund loans were considered, and question whether the scope of work is justified. Seek to understand the long-term financial planning; a poorly managed assessment often stems from years of underfunding reserves or deferred maintenance. This dialogue serves two purposes: it may reveal legitimate reasoning you hadn’t considered, and it demonstrates to the board and your neighbors that you are a reasonable, engaged member seeking clarity, not simply an obstructionist.If the answers remain unsatisfactory and you suspect genuine mismanagement or a violation of governing rules, you must document your concerns formally. Send a certified letter to the board and property manager outlining your specific objections, referencing the relevant sections of the CC&Rs or bylaws you believe are not being followed. This creates a paper trail and elevates the issue beyond casual conversation. Furthermore, discuss your concerns with other homeowners. You may find shared apprehension, and a collective, unified voice carries significantly more weight than a solitary one. However, ensure this coalition focuses on facts and solutions, not gossip, to maintain credibility.Should internal appeals fail, you face limited but serious avenues for escalation. One option is to pursue dispute resolution mechanisms outlined in your governing documents, which may involve mediation or arbitration. This is often a required step before litigation. The final recourse is legal action, but this is a significant step with considerable cost and potential for community discord. A lawyer specializing in community association law can advise if the board breached its fiduciary duty, acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner, or violated its own governing documents. A court will generally not overrule a board’s decision made in good faith and within its authority, even if some owners disagree with it. Therefore, litigation is typically only warranted for clear procedural violations or demonstrable financial malfeasance.Throughout this process, it is essential to weigh the practical consequences of non-payment. Refusing to pay a properly levied assessment, even under protest, usually results in late fees, interest accrual, and potentially a lien on your property. The financial and legal risks of withholding payment are almost always greater than the assessment itself. Ultimately, while challenging a special assessment is a difficult path, a resident’s vigilance is a vital component of a healthy community. By moving from frustration to fact-finding, from complaint to constructive questions, you not only protect your own interests but also contribute to greater transparency and accountability within the association, fostering better governance for all.
Lenders typically require borrowers to have significant cash reserves after closing. It is common for lenders to require 6 to 12 months of mortgage payments (including principal, interest, taxes, and insurance) in reserve. These funds must be “seasoned,“ meaning they have been in your account for a certain period.
Lenders have strict credit requirements for jumbo loans due to the larger loan amounts and higher risk. A minimum FICO score of 700 is commonly required, and many of the most competitive jumbo loan programs will require a score of 720 or higher.
The interest you pay on a cash-out refinance may be tax-deductible if you use the funds to “buy, build, or substantially improve” the home that secures the loan. If the cash is used for other purposes, like debt consolidation, the interest is generally not deductible. You should always consult a tax advisor for your specific situation.
Potentially, yes. Once you have a mortgage, your DTI increases. When you apply for new credit, lenders will see this major financial obligation and may be hesitant to extend additional credit if your DTI is too high, as it suggests a larger portion of your income is already committed to debt repayment.
Often, yes. Because renovation loans carry more complexity and perceived risk for the lender (the home is under construction), the interest rate is usually 0.25% to 0.50% higher than a standard 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. However, this can still be more cost-effective than financing renovations with a higher-interest secondary loan.
